Paper detail

Electron cyclotron drift instability and anomalous transport: two-fluid moment theory and modeling

In the presence of a strong electric field perpendicular to the magnetic field, the electron cross-field (E$\times$B) flow relative to the unmagnetized ions can cause the Electron Cyclotron Drift Instability (ECDI) due to resonances of the ion acoustic mode and the electron cyclotron harmonics. This occurs in collisionless shock ramps in space, and in $\rm{E \times B}$ discharge devices such as Hall thrusters. ECDI can induce an electron flow parallel to the background E field at a speed greatly exceeding predictions by classical collision theory. Such anomalous transport may lead to particle thermalization at space shocks, and may cause unfavorable plasma flows towards the walls of E$\times$B devices. The development of ECDI and anomalous transport is often considered fully-kinetic. In this work, however, we demonstrate that a reduced variant of this instability, and more importantly, the associated anomalous transport, can be treated self-consistently in a two-fluid framework without any collision. By treating electrons and ions on an equal footing, the free energy allows the growth of an anomalous electron flow parallel to the background E field. We first present linear analyses of the instability in the two-fluid 5- and 10-moment models, and compare them against the fully-kinetic theory. At lower temperatures, the two-fluid fastest-growing mode is in good agreement with the kinetic result. Also, by including more ($>=10$) moments, secondary (and possibly higher) unstable branches can be recovered. The dependence of the instability on various parameters is also explored. We then carry out direct numerical simulations of the cross-field setup using the 5-moment model. The growth of the instability and the anomalous transport is confirmed. Finally, 5-moment and Vlasov simulations using identical parameters in the lower-temperature regime are performed, showing reasonable agreement.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.