Paper detail

Electron capture of strongly screening nuclides $^{56}$Fe, $^{56}$Co, $^{56}$Ni , $^{56}$Mn ,$^{56}$Cr and $^{56}$V in presupernova

According to the Shell-Model Monte Carlo method, basing on the Random Phase Approximation and the linear response theory, we carried out an estimation on electron capture of strongly screening nuclides $^{56}$Fe, $^{56}$Co, $^{56}$Ni , $^{56}$Mn ,$^{56}$Cr and $^{56}$V in strong electron screening (SES)in presupernova. The EC rates are decreased greatly and even exceed $21.5\%$ in SES. We also compare our results with those of Aufderheide (AFUD), which calculated by the method of Aufderheide in SES. Our results are agreed reasonably well with AUFD at higher density-temperature surroundings (e.g. $ρ_7>60, T_9=15.40$) and the maximum error is $\sim $0.5$\%$. However, the maximum error is $\sim $13.0$\%$ at lower density surroundings (e.g. $^{56}$Cr at $ρ_7=10, T_9=15.40, Y_e=0.41$ ). On the other hand, we also compared our results in SES with those of FFN's and Nabi's, which is in the case without SES. The comparisons show that our results are lower more than one order magnitude than FFN's, but about $7.23\%$ than Nabi's.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.