Paper detail

Electron $ν\barν$ Bremsstrahlung in a Liquid Phase of Neutron Star Crusts

Neutrino emissivity from the electron $ν\barν$ bremsstrahlung in the liquid layers of the neutron star crusts is studied. Nuclear composition of matter in neutron star crusts is considered for various scenarios of neutron star evolution. For the deep layers of the crust, the compositions of cold catalyzed matter, accreted matter and hot matter ($T \ga 5 \times 10^9$~K) are shown to be very different, and this implies differences in the neutrino emissivity at given density and temperature. Neutrino-pair bremsstrahlung, due to collisions of relativistic degenerate electrons in a Coulomb liquid of atomic nuclei, is considered. The neutrino energy loss rate is expressed in a simple form through a Coulomb logarithm $L$ -- a slowly varying function of density, temperature, and nuclear composition. Non-Born corrections, thermal width of electron Fermi sphere, and finite sizes of nuclei are taken into account. Implications for cooling of neutron stars are discussed.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.