Paper detail

Electromagnetic fields in matter revisited

The force density on matter and the kinetic energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field in matter are obtained starting from Maxwell equations and Lorentz force at microscopic level and averaging over a small region of space-time. The macroscopic force density is taken to depend linearly on the average fields and their first derivatives and is shown to be determined by two phenomenological fields which are subsequently identified with the free current density and the polarization density tensor. It is shown that as expected, the average current density is the sum of the free current density and a dipolar contribution and that the average field satisfy the Maxwell equations. The macroscopic energy-momentum tensor of the field is shown to be equal to the standard empty-space energy-momentum tensor built with the macroscopic fields plus a dipolar correction. The density of momentum of the field is confirmed to be given by Minkowski's expression. The energy-momentum tensor of macroscopic matter is equal to the average of the microscopic energy-momentum tensor of matter plus the difference between the average tensor of microscopic fields and the macroscopic tensor of fields.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.