Paper detail

Electrohydrodynamic settling of drop in uniform electric field at low and moderate Reynolds numbers

Dynamics of a liquid drop falling through a quiescent medium of another liquid is investigated in external uniform electric field. The electrohydrodynamics of a drop is governed by inherent deformability of the drop (defined by capillary number), the electric field strength (defined by Masson number) and the surface charge convection (quantified by electric Reynolds number). Surface charge convection generates nonlinearilty in a electrohydrodynamics problem by coupling the electric field and flow field. In Stokes limit, most existing theoretical models either considered weak charge convection or weak electric field to solve the problem. In the present work, gravitational settling of the drop is investigated analytically and numerically in Stokes limit considering significant electric field strength and surface charge convection. Drop deformation accurate upto higher order is calculated analytically in small deformation regime. Our theoretical results show excellent agreement with the numerical and shows improvement over previous theoretical models. For drops falling with moderate Reynolds number, the effect of Masson number on transient drop dynamics is studied for (i) perfect dielectric drop in perfect dielectric medium (ii) leaky dielectric drop in the leaky dielectric medium. For the latter case transient deformation and velocity obtained for significant charge convection is compared with that of absence in charge convection which is the novelty of our study. The present study suggests that for both the regimes, surface charge convection tends to increase or decrease the settling speed depending upon the ratios of electrical properties. Notably, in the inertial regime, deformation and velocity are seen to be altered prominently in the existence of significant charge convection.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.