Paper detail

Electrical evolution of W and WC Schottky contacts on 4H-SiC at different annealing temperatures

In this paper, we investigate the electrical evolution of tungsten (W) and tungsten carbide (WC) Schottky contacts on 4H-SiC subjected to thermal treatments at different annealing temperatures from 475 to 700 ° C. For each annealing temperature, the uniformity of the Schottky barrier height (${ϕ_B}$) and ideality factor (n) was monitored by current-voltage (I-V) measurements in forward bias, performed over sets of equivalent diodes. Good values of n (below 1.05) were found for both contacts up to thermal annealing at 700 ° C. On the other hand, the barrier of the two contacts behaves differently. For the W/4H-SiC diode, the ${ϕ_B}$ increases with the annealing temperature (from 1.14 eV at 475 ° C to 1.25 eV at 700 ° C), whereas the Schottky barrier in WC/4H-SiC features a slight reduction already with thermal annealing at 475 ° C, remaining almost constant at around 1.06 eV up to annealing at 700 ° C. A deeper characterization was performed on the 700 ° C-annealed contacts by studying the temperature-dependence of the Schottky parameters by current-voltage-temperature (I-V-T) characterization. The ${ϕ_B}$ and n behaviour with temperature indicates the presence of a nanoscale lateral inhomogeneity for both Schottky contacts, which can be described by Tung's model. Finally, the temperature-dependence of the reverse characteristics could be described by the thermionic field emission model (TFE), accounting for the temperature dependent barrier height determined from forward characterization.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.