Paper detail

Electrical and thermal transport through $α-T_3$ NIS junction

We investigate the electrical and thermal transport properties of the $α-T_3$ based normal metal-insulator-superconductor (NIS) junction using Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk (BTK) theory. We show that the tunneling conductance of the NIS junction is an oscillatory function of the effective barrier potential ($χ$) of the insulating region upto a thin barrier limit. The periodicity and the amplitudes of the oscillations largely depend on the values of $α$ and the gate voltage of the superconducting region, namely, $U_0$. Further, the periodicity of the oscillation changes from $π$ to $π/2$ as we increase $U_0$. To assess the thermoelectric performance of such a junction, we have computed the Seebeck coefficient, the thermoelectric figure of merit, maximum power output, efficiency at the maximum output power of the system, and the thermoelectric cooling of the NIS junction as a self-cooling device. Our results on the thermoelectric cooling indicate practical realizability and usefulness for using our system as efficient cooling detectors, sensors, etc., and hence could be crucial to the experimental success of the thermoelectric applications of such junction devices. Furthermore, for an $α-T_3$ lattice, whose limiting cases denote a graphene or a dice lattice, it is interesting to ascertain which one is more suitable as a thermoelectric device and the answer seems to depend on the $U_0$. We observe that for an $α-T_3$ lattice corresponding to $U_0=0$, graphene ($α=0$) is more feasible for constructing a thermoelectric device, whereas for $U_0 \gg E_F$, the dice lattice ($α=1$) has a larger utility.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.