Paper detail

Ejection velocities of high Galactic latitude runaway stars

We estimate the distribution of ejection velocities for the known population of high galactic latitude runaway stars. The initial sample is a collection of 174 early-type stars selected from the literature. The stars are first classified according to their evolutionary status in order to obtain a homogeneous sample of 96 genuine main sequence stars. Their present velocities and flight times are then estimated using proper motion data from various astrometric catalogues (including Tycho-2, UCAC2, and USNO-B) and the ejection velocities are computed by tracing their orbits back in time, based on a galactic potential. The potential used is constructed from a mass density model chosen to fit the most recent observational constraints. We find evidence for two different populations of runaway stars: a "high" velocity population, with a maximum ejection velocity of about 400 - 500 km/s, and a "low" velocity population, with a maximum ejection velocity of about 300 km/s. We argue that the observed limit of 500 km/s and the bimodality of the observed ejection velocity distribution are natural consequences of the so-called Binary Ejection Mechanism. We discuss the connection between the "high" velocity population and the so-called hypervelocity stars, showing how previously studied hypervelocity stars are consistent with the results obtained. We also find that some stars that were once thought to be best explained as being formed in the Halo are compatible with a runaway hypothesis once proper motions are included in the analysis. However, three stars in the selected sample appear to be inconsistent with ejection from the galactic disc. Possible scenarios are discussed, including a possible formation in the galactic halo.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.