Paper detail

Ejecta emplacement as the possible origin of Ryugu's equatorial ridge

The Japanese spacecraft Hayabusa 2 visited the asteroid (162173) Ryugu and provided many high-resolution images of its surface, revealing that Ryugu has a spinning-top shape with a prominent equatorial ridge, much like the shapes reported for some other asteroids. In this study, through dozens of numerical calculations, we demonstrate that during a period of fast rotation, ejecta from craters formed at lower and mid-latitudes can be deposited on the equatorial ridge. Assuming a rotation period of 3 h, we estimate that an equatorial ridge with a height of 50 m can be generated in 128(+47 / -27) My for a main-belt asteroid, or 3.1(+4.2 / -1.2) Gy for a near-Earth asteroid. Therefore, an equatorial ridge can form within the average mean collisional lifetime of a km-sized asteroid within the main belt, but not for near-Earth asteroids. Furthermore, our model may explain why blue (younger) material occurs on the equatorial ridge.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.