Paper detail

Eiger: Auditable, executable, flexible legal regulations

Despite recent advances in communication and automation, regulations are still written in natural-language prose, subject to ambiguity, inconsistency, and incompleteness. How can we craft regulations with precision? Our solution is embodied in Eiger, a domain-specific programming language embedded in Haskell. A domain expert pairs with a software engineer to write regulations in Eiger. The domain expert needs only to read and audit the code, but not write it. A first, limited, user study suggests that this works well in practice because Eiger code mostly looks like Excel formulas with simple SQL queries. Eiger forms the kernel of a new strategy to deliver value to clients in our professional services business with increased automation and precision. The framework is executable: based on client data, we can use Eiger both to deduce how best to adapt to a new regulation and then maintain compliance. This paper reviews the design of Eiger and walks through its implementation. To preserve a straightforward surface syntax but with monadic semantics, we have leveraged advanced features, including GHC.Generics, the new OverloadedRecordDot extension, and a novel approach to performing class instance selection at run-time.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.