Paper detail

Eicheons instead of Black holes

A new spherically-symmetric solution for a gravitational field is found in the conformally-unimodular metric. It is shown, that the surface of the black hole horizon in the standard Schwarzschild metric can be squeezed to a point by converting coordinates to the conformally-unimodular metric. In this new metric, there is no black hole horizon, while the naked singularity corresponds to a point massive particle. The reason for the study of this particular gauge (i.e., conformally-unimodular metric) is its relation to the vacuum energy problem. That aims to relate it to other physical phenomena (including black holes), and one could argue that they should be considered in this particular metric. That means the violation of the gauge invariance of the general theory of relativity. As a result, the nonsingular "eicheons" appear as the non-point compact objects with different masses and structures. They are a final product of the stellar collapse, with the masses exceeding the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.