Paper detail

Efficient Simulation for Branching Linear Recursions

We consider a linear recursion of the form $$R^{(k+1)}\stackrel{\mathcal D}{=}\sum_{i=1}^{N}C_iR^{(k)}_i+Q,$$ where $(Q,N,C_1,C_2,\dots)$ is a real-valued random vector with $N\in\mathbb{N}=\{0, 1, 2, \dots\}$, $\{R^{(k)}_i\}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}$ is a sequence of i.i.d. copies of $R^{(k)}$, independent of $(Q,N,C_1,C_2,\dots)$, and $\stackrel{\mathcal{D}}{=}$ denotes equality in distribution. For suitable vectors $(Q,N,C_1,C_2,\dots)$ and provided the initial distribution of $R^{(0)}$ is well-behaved, the process $R^{(k)}$ is known to converge to the endogenous solution of the corresponding stochastic fixed-point equation, which appears in the analysis of information ranking algorithms, e.g., PageRank, and in the complexity analysis of divide and conquer algorithms, e.g. Quicksort. Naive Monte Carlo simulation of $R^{(k)}$ based on the branching recursion has exponential complexity in $k$, and therefore the need for efficient methods. We propose in this paper an iterative bootstrap algorithm that has linear complexity and can be used to approximately sample $R^{(k)}$. We show the consistency of estimators based on our proposed algorithm.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.