Paper detail

Efficient Semantic Summary Graphs for Querying Large Knowledge Graphs

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) integrate heterogeneous data, but one challenge is the development of efficient tools for allowing end users to extract useful insights from these sources of knowledge. In such a context, reducing the size of a Resource Description Framework (RDF) graph while preserving all information can speed up query engines by limiting data shuffle, especially in a distributed setting. This paper presents two algorithms for RDF graph summarization: Grouping Based Summarization (GBS) and Query Based Summarization (QBS). The latter is an optimized and lossless approach for the former method. We empirically study the effectiveness of the proposed lossless RDF graph summarization to retrieve complete data, by rewriting an RDF Query Language called SPARQL query with fewer triple patterns using a semantic similarity. We conduct our experimental study in instances of four datasets with different sizes. Compared with the state-of-the-art query engine Sparklify executed over the original RDF graphs as a baseline, QBS query execution time is reduced by up to 80% and the summarized RDF graph is decreased by up to 99%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.