Paper detail

Efficient reduction of Kappa models by static inspection of the rule-set

When designing genetic circuits, the typical primitives used in major existing modelling formalisms are gene interaction graphs, where edges between genes denote either an activation or inhibition relation. However, when designing experiments, it is important to be precise about the low-level mechanistic details as to how each such relation is implemented. The rule-based modelling language Kappa allows to unambiguously specify mechanistic details such as DNA binding sites, dimerisation of transcription factors, or co-operative interactions. However, such a detailed description comes with complexity and computationally costly execution. We propose a general method for automatically transforming a rule-based program, by eliminating intermediate species and adjusting the rate constants accordingly. Our method consists of searching for those interaction patterns known to be amenable to equilibrium approximations (e.g. Michaelis-Menten scheme). The reduced model is efficiently obtained by static inspection over the rule-set, and it represents a particular theoretical limit of the original model. The Bhattacharyya distance is proposed as a metric to estimate the reduction error for a given observable. The tool is tested on a detailed rule-based model of a $λ$-phage switch, which lists $96$ rules and $16$ agents. The reduced model has $11$ rules and $5$ agents, and provides a dramatic reduction in simulation time of several orders of magnitude.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.