Paper detail

Efficient Reachability Ratio Computation for 2-hop Labeling Scheme

As one of the fundamental graph operations, reachability queries processing has been extensively studied during the past decades. Many approaches followed the line of designing 2-hop labels to make acceleration. Considering that the index size cannot be bounded when using all nodes to construct 2-hop labels, researchers proposed to use a part of important nodes to construct 2-hop labels (partial 2-hop labels) to cover as much reachability information as possible. Then, we may achieve better query performance with limited index size and index construction time. However, partial 2-hop labels do not always perform well on different graphs. In this paper, we focus on the problem of how to efficiently compute reachability ratio, such that to help users determine whether partial 2-hop labels should be used to answer reachability queries for the given graph. Intuitively, reachability ratio denotes the ratio of the number of reachable queries that can be answered by partial 2-hop labels over the total number of reachable queries involved in the given graph. We discuss the difficulties of reachability ratio computation, and propose an incremental-partition algorithm for reachability ratio computation. We show by rich experimental results that our algorithm can efficiently get the result of reachability ratio, and show how the overall query performance is affected by different partial 2-hop labels. Based on the experimental results, we give out our findings on whether partial 2-hop labels should be used to the given graph for reachability queries processing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.