Paper detail

Efficient Reachability Query Evaluation in Large Spatiotemporal Contact Datasets

With the advent of reliable positioning technologies and prevalence of location-based services, it is now feasible to accurately study the propagation of items such as infectious viruses, sensitive information pieces, and malwares through a population of moving objects, e.g., individuals, mobile devices, and vehicles. In such application scenarios, an item passes between two objects when the objects are sufficiently close (i.e., when they are, so-called, in contact), and hence once an item is initiated, it can penetrate the object population through the evolving network of contacts among objects, termed contact network. In this paper, for the first time we define and study reachability queries in large (i.e., disk-resident) contact datasets which record the movement of a (potentially large) set of objects moving in a spatial environment over an extended time period. A reachability query verifies whether two objects are "reachable" through the evolving contact network represented by such contact datasets. We propose two contact-dataset indexes that enable efficient evaluation of such queries despite the potentially humongous size of the contact datasets. With the first index, termed ReachGrid, at the query time only a small necessary portion of the contact network which is required for reachability evaluation is constructed and traversed. With the second approach, termed ReachGraph, we precompute reachability at different scales and leverage these precalculations at the query time for efficient query processing. We optimize the placement of both indexes on disk to enable efficient index traversal during query processing. We study the pros and cons of our proposed approaches by performing extensive experiments with both real and synthetic data. Based on our experimental results, our proposed approaches outperform existing reachability query processing techniques in contact n...[truncated].

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.