Paper detail

Efficient MRF Energy Minimization via Adaptive Diminishing Smoothing

We consider the linear programming relaxation of an energy minimization problem for Markov Random Fields. The dual objective of this problem can be treated as a concave and unconstrained, but non-smooth function. The idea of smoothing the objective prior to optimization was recently proposed in a series of papers. Some of them suggested the idea to decrease the amount of smoothing (so called temperature) while getting closer to the optimum. However, no theoretical substantiation was provided. We propose an adaptive smoothing diminishing algorithm based on the duality gap between relaxed primal and dual objectives and demonstrate the efficiency of our approach with a smoothed version of Sequential Tree-Reweighted Message Passing (TRW-S) algorithm. The strategy is applicable to other algorithms as well, avoids adhoc tuning of the smoothing during iterations, and provably guarantees convergence to the optimum.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.