Paper detail

Efficient Isomorphism for $S_d$-graphs and $T$-graphs

An $H$-graph is one representable as the intersection graph of connected subgraphs of a suitable subdivision of a fixed graph $H$, introduced by Biró, Hujter and Tuza (1992). An $H$-graph is proper if the representing subgraphs of $H$ can be chosen incomparable by the inclusion. In this paper, we focus on the isomorphism problem for $S_d$-graphs and $T$-graphs, where $S_d$ is the star with $d$ rays and $T$ is an arbitrary fixed tree. Answering an open problem of Chaplick, Töpfer, Voborn\'ık and Zeman (2016), we provide an FPT-time algorithm for testing isomorphism and computing the automorphism group of $S_d$-graphs when parameterized by~$d$, which involves the classical group-computing machinery by Furst, Hopcroft, and Luks (1980). We also show that the isomorphism problem of $S_d$-graphs is at least as hard as the isomorphism problem of posets of bounded width, for which no efficient combinatorial-only algorithm is known to date. Then we extend our approach to an XP-time algorithm for isomorphism of $T$-graphs when parameterized by the size of $T$. Lastly, we contribute a simple FPT-time combinatorial algorithm for isomorphism testing in the special case of proper $S_d$- and $T$-graphs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.