Paper detail

Efficient gPC-based quantification of probabilistic robustness for systems in neuroscience

Robustness analysis is very important in biology and neuroscience, to unravel behavioural patterns of systems that are conserved despite large parametric uncertainties. To make studies of probabilistic robustness more efficient and scalable when addressing complex models in neuroscience, we propose an alternative to computationally expensive Monte Carlo (MC) methods by introducing and analysing the generalised polynomial chaos (gPC) framework for uncertainty quantification. We consider both intrusive and non-intrusive gPC approaches, which turn out to be scalable and allow for a fast comprehensive exploration of parameter spaces. Focusing on widely used models of neural dynamics as case studies, we explore the trade-off between efficiency and accuracy of gPC methods, and we adopt the proposed methodology to investigate parametric uncertainties in models that feature multiple dynamic regimes.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.