Paper detail

Efficient Deterministic Single Round Document Exchange for Edit Distance

Suppose that we have two parties that possess each a binary string. Suppose that the length of the first string (document) is $n$ and that the two strings (documents) have edit distance (minimal number of deletes, inserts and substitutions needed to transform one string into the other) at most $k$. The problem we want to solve is to devise an efficient protocol in which the first party sends a single message that allows the second party to guess the first party's string. In this paper we show an efficient deterministic protocol for this problem. The protocol runs in time $O(n\cdot \mathtt{polylog}(n))$ and has message size $O(k^2+k\log^2n)$ bits. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first efficient deterministic protocol for this problem, if efficiency is measured in both the message size and the running time. As an immediate application of our new protocol, we show a new error correcting code that is efficient even for large numbers of (adversarial) edit errors.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.