Paper detail

Efficient characterization of correlated SPAM errors

State preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors limit the performance of many gate-based quantum computing architecures, but are partly correctable after a calibration step that requires, for an exact implementation on a register of $n$ qubits, $2^n$ additional characterization experiments, as well as classical post-processing. Here we introduce an approximate but efficient method for SPAM error characterization requiring the {\it classical} processing of $2^n \! \times 2^n$ real matrices, but only $O(n^2)$ measurements. The technique assumes that multi-qubit measurement errors are dominated by pair correlations, which are estimated with $n(n-1)k/2$ two-qubit experiments, where $k$ is a parameter related to the accuracy. We demonstrate the technique on the IBM and Rigetti online superconducting quantum computers, allowing comparison of their SPAM errors in both magnitude and degree of correlation. We also study the correlations as a function of the register's geometric layout. We find that the pair-correlation model is fairly accurate on linear arrays of superconducting qubits. However qubits arranged in more closely spaced two-dimensional geometries exhibit significant higher-order (such as 3-qubit) SPAM error correlations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.