Paper detail

Efficient approximation of branching random walk Gibbs measures

Disordered systems such as spin glasses have been used extensively as models for high-dimensional random landscapes and studied from the perspective of optimization algorithms. In a recent paper by L. Addario-Berry and the second author, the continuous random energy model (CREM) was proposed as a simple toy model to study the efficiency of such algorithms. The following question was raised in that paper: what is the threshold $β_G$, at which sampling (approximately) from the Gibbs measure at inverse temperature $β$ becomes algorithmically hard? This paper is a first step towards answering this question. We consider the branching random walk, a time-homogeneous version of the continuous random energy model. We show that a simple greedy search on a renormalized tree yields a linear-time algorithm which approximately samples from the Gibbs measure, for every $β< β_c$, the (static) critical point. More precisely, we show that for every $\varepsilon>0$, there exists such an algorithm such that the specific relative entropy between the law sampled by the algorithm and the Gibbs measure of inverse temperature $β$ is less than $\varepsilon$ with high probability. In the supercritical regime $β> β_c$, we provide the following hardness result. Under a mild regularity condition, for every $δ> 0$, there exists $z>0$ such that the running time of any given algorithm approximating the Gibbs measure stochastically dominates a geometric random variable with parameter $e^{-z\sqrt{N}}$ on an event with probability at least $1-δ$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.