Paper detail

Efficient Algorithms for Battleship

We consider an algorithmic problem inspired by the Battleship game. In the variant of the problem that we investigate, there is a unique ship of shape $S \subset Z^2$ which has been translated in the lattice $Z^2$. We assume that a player has already hit the ship with a first shot and the goal is to sink the ship using as few shots as possible, that is, by minimizing the number of missed shots. While the player knows the shape $S$, which position of $S$ has been hit is not known. Given a shape $S$ of $n$ lattice points, the minimum number of misses that can be achieved in the worst case by any algorithm is called the Battleship complexity of the shape $S$ and denoted $c(S)$. We prove three bounds on $c(S)$, each considering a different class of shapes. First, we have $c(S) \leq n-1$ for arbitrary shapes and the bound is tight for parallelogram-free shapes. Second, we provide an algorithm that shows that $c(S) = O(\log n)$ if $S$ is an HV-convex polyomino. Third, we provide an algorithm that shows that $c(S) = O(\log \log n)$ if $S$ is a digital convex set. This last result is obtained through a novel discrete version of the Blaschke-Lebesgue inequality relating the area and the width of any convex body.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.