Paper detail

Efficiency of pseudo-spectrum methods for estimation of Cosmic Microwave Background B-mode power spectrum

Estimation of the B-mode angular power spectrum of polarized anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is a key step towards a full exploitation of the scientific potential of this probe. In the context of pseudo-spectrum methods the major challenge is related to a contamination of the B-mode spectrum estimate with residual power of much larger E-mode. This so-called E-to-B leakage is unavoidably present whenever an incomplete sky map is only available, as is the case for any realistic observation. The leakage has to be then minimized or removed and ideally in such a way that neither a bias nor extra variance is introduced. In this paper, we compare from these two perspectives three different methods proposed recently in this context Refs. Smith 2006, Zhao & Baskaran 2010, Kim & Naselsky 2010, which we first introduce within a common algebraic framework of the so-called chi-fields and then study their performance on two different experimental configurations - one corresponding to a small-scale experiment covering 1% of the sky motivated by current ground-based or balloon-borne experiments and another - to a nearly full-sky experiment, e.g., a possible CMB B-mode satellite mission. We find that though all these methods allow to reduce significantly the level of the E-to-B leakage, it is the method of Smith 2006, which at the same time ensures the smallest error bars in all experimental configurations studied here, owing to the fact that it permits straightforwardly for an optimization of the sky apodization of the polarization maps used for the estimation. For a satellite-like experiment, this method enables a detection of B-mode power spectrum at large angular scales but only after appropriate binning. The method of Zhao & Baskaran 2010 is a close runner-up in the case of a nearly full sky coverage.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.