Paper detail

Effects of varying inhalation duration and respiratory rate on human airway flow

Studies of flow through the human airway have shown that inhalation time (IT) and secondary flow structures can play important roles in particle deposition. However, the effects of varying IT in conjunction with respiratory rate (RR) on airway flow remain unknown. Using 3D numerical simulations of oscillatory flow through an idealized airway model consisting of a mouth inlet, glottis, trachea and symmetric double bifurcation at trachea Reynolds number ($Re$) of 4,200, we investigated how varying the ratio of IT to breathing time (BT) from 25% to 50% and RR from 10 breaths per minute (bpm) corresponding to Womersley number ($Wo$) of 2.37 to 1,000 bpm ($Wo$=23.7) impacts airway flow characteristics. Irrespective of IT/BT, axial flow during inhalation at tracheal cross-sections was non-uniform for $Wo$=2.37 as compared to centrally concentrated distribution for $Wo$=23.7. For a given $Wo$ and IT/BT, both axial and secondary (lateral) flow components unevenly split between left and right branches of a bifurcation. Irrespective of $Wo$, IT/BT and airway generation, lateral dispersion was stronger than axial flow streaming. Despite left-right symmetry of the lower airway in our model, the right-sided mouth-to-glottis portion generated turbulence in the upper airway. Varying IT/BT for a given $Wo$ did not noticeably change flow characteristics. Discrepancy in the oscillatory flow relation $Re$/$Wo^2$=2$L$/$D$ ($L$=stroke length; $D$=trachea diameter) was observed for IT/BT$\neq$50%, as $L$ changed with IT/BT. We developed a modified dimensionless stroke length term including IT/BT. While viscous forces and convective acceleration were dominant for lower $Wo$, unsteady acceleration was dominant for higher $Wo$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.