Paper detail

Effects of time-varying $β$ in SNLS3 on constraining interacting dark energy models

It has been found that, for the Supernova Legacy Survey three-year (SNLS3) data, there is strong evidence for the redshift-evolution of color-luminosity parameter $β$. In this paper, adopting the $w$-cold-dark-matter ($w$CDM) model and considering its interacting extensions (with three kinds of interaction between dark sectors), we explore the evolution of $β$ and its effects on parameter estimation. In addition to the SNLS3 data, we also take into account the Planck distance priors data of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the galaxy clustering (GC) data extracted from SDSS DR7 and BOSS, as well as the direct measurement of Hubble constant from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observation. We find that, for all the interacting dark energy (IDE) models, adding a parameter of $β$ can reduce $χ^2$ by $\sim$ 34, indicating that $β_1 = 0$ is ruled out at 5.8$σ$ confidence level (CL). Furthermore, it is found that varying $β$ can significantly change the fitting results of various cosmological parameters: for all the dark energy models considered in this paper, varying $β$ yields a larger $Ω_{c0}$ and a larger $w$; on the other side, varying $β$ yields a smaller $h$ for the $w$CDM model, but has no impact on $h$ for the three IDE models. This implies that there is a degeneracy between $h$ and $γ$. Our work shows that the evolution of $β$ is insensitive to the interaction between dark sectors, and then highlights the importance of considering $β$'s evolution in the cosmology fits.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.