Paper detail

Effects of the Hubble Parameter on the Cosmic Growth of the First Quasars

Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) play a crucial role in the evolution of galaxies and are currently detected up to $z\sim 7.5$. Theories describing black hole (BH) growth are challenged by how rapidly seeds with initial mass $M_{\bullet} \lesssim 10^5 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$, formed at $z \sim 20-30$, grew to $M_{\bullet} \sim 10^9 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ by $z\sim 7$. Here we study the effects of the value of the Hubble parameter, $H_0$, on models describing the early growth of BHs. First, we note that the predicted mass of a quasar at $z=6$ changes by $> 300$% if the underlying Hubble parameter used in the model varies from $H_0 = 65$ to $H_0 = 74$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$, a range encompassing current estimates. Employing an MCMC approach based on priors from $z \gtrsim 6.5$ quasars and on $H_0$, we study the interconnection between $H_0$ and the parameters describing BH growth: seed mass $M_i$ and Eddington ratio $f_{\rm Edd}$. Assuming an Eddington ratio of $f_{\rm Edd} = 0.7$, in agreement with previous estimates, we find $H_0 = 73.6^{+1.2}_{-3.3}$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$. In a second analysis, allowing all the parameters to vary freely, we find $\log(M_{i}/\mathrm{M_{\odot}}) > 4.5$ (at 95% CL), $H_0 = 74^{+1.5}_{-1.4}$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$ and $f_{\rm Edd}=0.77^{+0.035}_{-0.026}$ at 68% CL. Our results on the typical Eddington ratio are in agreement with previous estimates. Current values of the Hubble parameter strongly favour heavy seed formation scenarios, with $M_i \gtrsim 10^4 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$. In our model, with the priors on BH masses of quasars used, light seed formation scenarios are rejected at $\sim 3σ$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.