Paper detail

Effects of shocks in stellar atmosphere models on the emission line spectrum of surrounding Hii regions

Emission line studies from Hii regions in galaxies require tools for the inversion of line ratios into desired physical properties. These tools generally come in form of diagnostic ratios/diagrams that are based on grids of photoionisation models. An important input to the photoionisation models is the stellar atmosphere spectrum of the ionising sources. The current omission of shocks in the calculation of the former set of models could threaten the accuracy of the physical interpretation of emission line ratios from Hii regions. Current stellar atmosphere models that are crucial inputs to the grid of photoionisation models used to generate nebular emission line diagnostic diagrams might produce significant biases due to the omission of shocks. We investigate whether a new generation of photoionisation model grids, taking shocks into account, is required to compensate for the biases. We make use of the WM-Basic stellar atmosphere code, which can account for the extra energetic emission in the stellar spectral energy distribution produced by shocks, in conjunction with the photoionisation code MOCASSIN to determine whether shocks produce significant biases in the determination of the physical parameters of the interstellar medium and/or ionising stellar parameters. We conclude that these effects are only important for stellar sources with effective temperatures lower than 30kK and in this case they yield artificially high stellar temperatures, electron temperatures and nebular ionisation parameters. The magnitude of the effect is also obviously dependent on the strength of the shock and is likely to be unimportant for the majority of stellar sources. Nevertheless, we find our 20kK and 30kK shock models to strongly enhance the He ii 4686 nebular emission line. This result is however not strong enough to explain previously observed He ii 4686 line emission in the spectra of Hii galaxies.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.