Paper detail

Effects of round-to-nearest and stochastic rounding in the numerical solution of the heat equation in low precision

Motivated by the advent of machine learning, the last few years have seen the return of hardware-supported low-precision computing. Computations with fewer digits are faster and more memory and energy efficient, but can be extremely susceptible to rounding errors. As shown by recent studies into reduced-precision climate simulations, an application that can largely benefit from the advantages of low-precision computing is the numerical solution of partial differential equations (PDEs). However, a careful implementation and rounding error analysis are required to ensure that sensible results can still be obtained. In this paper we study the accumulation of rounding errors in the solution of the heat equation, a proxy for parabolic PDEs, via Runge-Kutta finite difference methods using round-to-nearest (RtN) and stochastic rounding (SR). We demonstrate how to implement the scheme to reduce rounding errors and we derive \emph{a priori} estimates for local and global rounding errors. Let $u$ be the unit roundoff. While the worst-case local errors are $O(u)$ with respect to the discretization parameters (mesh size and timestep), the RtN and SR error behavior is substantially different. In fact, the RtN solution always stagnates for small enough $Δt$, and until stagnation the global error grows like $O(uΔt^{-1})$. In contrast, we show that the leading-order errors introduced by SR are zero-mean, independent in space and mean-independent in time, making SR resilient to stagnation and rounding error accumulation. In fact, we prove that for SR the global rounding errors are only $O(uΔt^{-1/4})$ in 1D and are essentially bounded (up to logarithmic factors) in higher dimensions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.