Paper detail

Effects of Residue Background Events in Direct Dark Matter Detection Experiments on the Determinations of Ratios of WIMP-Nucleon Cross Sections

In our work on the development of model-independent data analysis methods for determining ratios between different couplings/cross sections of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) by using measured recoil energies from direct Dark Matter detection experiments directly, it was assumed that the analyzed data sets are background-free, i.e., all events are WIMP signals. In this article, as a more realistic study, we take into account a fraction of possible residue background events, which pass all discrimination criteria and then mix with other real WIMP-induced events in our data sets. Our simulations show that, assuming that the spin-dependent (SD) WIMP-nucleus interaction dominates over the spin-independent (SI) one, the maximal acceptable fraction of residue background events in the analyzed data sets for determining the ratio of the SD WIMP coupling on neutrons to that on protons is ~ 20% - 40%; whereas considering a general combination of the SI and SD WIMP interactions, the maximal acceptable background ratio for determining the ratio between two SD WIMP couplings as well as the ratios of the SD cross section on protons (neutrons) to the SI one is ~ 10% - 20%. Moreover, by considering different forms of background spectrum, we find that only background events in the lowest energy ranges could affect the reconstructions (significantly); those in high energy ranges would almost not change the reconstructed ratios or only very slightly.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.