Paper detail

Effects of nonmagnetic impurities and subgap states on the kinetic inductance, complex conductivity, quality factor and depairing current density

We investigate how a combination of a nonmagnetic-impurity scattering rate $γ$ and finite subgap states parametrized by Dynes $Γ$ affects various physical quantities relevant to to superconducting devices: kinetic inductance $L_k$, complex conductivity $σ$, surface resistance $R_s$, quality factor $Q$, and depairing current density $J_d$. All the calculations are based on the Eilenberger formalism of the BCS theory. We assume the device materials are extreme type-II $s$-wave superconductors. It is well known that the optimum impurity concentration ($γ/Δ_0 \sim 1$) minimizes $R_s$. Here, $Δ_0$ is the pair potential for the idealized ($Γ\to 0$) superconductor for the temperature $T\to 0$. We find the optimum $Γ$ can also reduce $R_s$ by one order of magnitude for a clean superconductor ($γ/Δ_0 < 1$) and a few tens $\%$ for a dirty superconductor ($γ/Δ_0 > 1$). Also, we find a nearly-ideal ($Γ/Δ_0 \ll 1$) clean-limit superconductor exhibits a frequency-independent $R_s$ for a broad range of frequency $ω$, which can significantly improve $Q$ of a very compact cavity with a few tens of GHz frequency. As $Γ$ or $γ$ increases, the plateau disappears, and $R_s$ obeys the $ω^2$ dependence. The subgap-state-induced residual surface resistance $R_{\rm res}$ is also studied, which can be detected by an SRF-grade high-$Q$ 3D resonator. We calculate $L_k(γ, Γ,T)$ and $J_d(γ, Γ,T)$, which are monotonic increasing and decreasing functions of $(γ, Γ,T)$, respectively. Measurements of $(γ, Γ)$ of device materials can give helpful information on engineering $(γ, Γ)$ via materials processing, by which it would be possible to improve $Q$, engineer $L_k$, and ameliorate $J_d$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.