Paper detail

Effects of non-uniform interstellar magnetic field on synchrotron X-ray and inverse-Compton gamma-ray morphology of SNRs

Observations of SNRs in X-ray and gamma-ray bands promise to contribute with important information in our understanding on the nature of galactic cosmic rays. The analysis of SNRs images collected in different energy bands requires the support of theoretical modeling of synchrotron and inverse Compton (IC) emission. We develop a numerical code (REMLIGHT) to synthesize, from MHD simulations, the synchrotron radio, X-ray and IC gamma-ray emission from SNRs expanding in non-uniform interstellar medium (ISM) and/or non-uniform interstellar magnetic field (ISMF). As a first application, the code is used to investigate the effects of non-uniform ISMF on the SNR morphology in the non-thermal X-ray and gamma-ray bands. We perform 3D MHD simulations of a spherical SNR shock expanding through a magnetized ISM with a gradient of ambient magnetic field strength. The model includes an approximate treatment of upstream magnetic field amplification and the effect of shock modification due to back reaction of accelerated cosmic rays. From the simulations, we synthesize the synchrotron radio, X-ray and IC gamma-ray emission with REMLIGHT, making different assumptions about the details of acceleration and injection of relativistic electrons. A gradient of the ambient magnetic field strength induces asymmetric morphologies in radio, X-ray and gamma-ray bands independently from the model of electron injection if the gradient has a component perpendicular to the line-of-sight. The degree of asymmetry of the remnant morphology depends on the details of the electron injection and acceleration and is different in the radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray bands. The non-thermal X-ray morphology is the most sensitive to the gradient, showing the highest degree of asymmetry. The IC gamma-ray emission is weakly sensitive to the non-uniform ISMF, the degree of asymmetry of the SNR morphology being the lowest in this band.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.