Paper detail

Effects of neuronal variability on phase synchronization of neural networks

An important idea in neural information processing is the communication-through-coherence hypothesis, according to which communication between two brain regions is effective only if they are phase-locked. Also of importance is neuronal variability, a phenomenon in which a single neuron's inter-firing times may be highly variable. In this work, we aim to connect these two ideas by studying the effects of that variability on the capability of neurons to reach phase synchronization. We simulate a network of modified-Hodgkin-Huxley-bursting neurons possessing a small-world topology. First, variability is shown to be correlated with the average degree of phase synchronization of the network. Next, restricting to spatial variability - which measures the deviation of firing times between all neurons in the network - we show that it is positively correlated to a behavior we call promiscuity, which is the tendency of neurons to to have their relative phases change with time. This relation is observed in all cases we tested, regardless of the degree of synchronization or the strength of the inter-neuronal coupling: high variability implies high promiscuity (low duration of phase-locking), even if the network as a whole is synchronized and the coupling is strong. We argue that spatial variability actually generates promiscuity. Therefore, we conclude that variability has a strong influence on both the degree and the manner in which neurons phase synchronize, which is another reason for its relevance in neural communication.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.