Paper detail

Effects of measurement dependence on 1-parameter family of Bell tests

Most quantum information tasks based on Bell tests relie on the assumption of measurement independence. However, it is difficult to ensure that the assumption of measurement independence is always met in experimental operations, so it is crucial to explore the effects of relaxing this assumption on Bell tests. In this paper, we discuss the effects of relaxing the assumption of measurement independence on 1-parameter family of Bell (1-PFB) tests. For both general and factorizable input distributions, we establish the relationship among measurement dependence, guessing probability, and the maximum value of 1-PFB correlation function that Eve can fake. The deterministic strategy when Eve fakes the maximum value is also given. We compare the unknown information rate of Chain inequality and 1-PFB inequality, and find the range of the parameter in which it is more difficult for Eve to fake the maximum quantum violation in 1-PFB inequality than in Chain inequality.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.