Paper detail

Effects of MAC Approaches on Non-Monotonic Saturation with COPE - A Simple Case Study

We construct a simple network model to provide insight into network design strategies. We show that the model can be used to address various approaches to network coding, MAC, and multi-packet reception so that their effects on network throughput can be evaluated. We consider several topology components which exhibit the same non-monotonic saturation behavior found within the Katti et. al. COPE experiments. We further show that fairness allocation by the MAC can seriously impact performance and cause this non-monotonic saturation. Using our model, we develop a MAC that provides monotonic saturation, higher saturation throughput gains and fairness among flows rather than nodes. The proposed model provides an estimate of the achievable gains for the cross-layer design of network coding, multi-packet reception, and MAC showing that super-additive throughput gains on the order of six times that of routing are possible.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.