Paper detail

Effects of Helium Enrichment in Globular Clusters I.Theoretical Plane with PGPUC stellar evolution code

Recently, the study of globular cluster (GC) CMDs has shown that some of them harbor multiple populations with different chemical compositions and/or ages. In the first case, the most common candidate is a spread in the initial helium abundance, but this quantity is difficult to determine spectroscopically due to the fact that helium absorption lines are not present in cooler stars, whereas for hotter GC stars gravitational settling of helium becomes important. As a consequence, indirect methods to determine the initial Y among populations are necessary. For that reason, in this series of papers, we investigate the effects of a Y enrichment in populations covering the range of GC metallicities. In this first paper, we present the theoretical evolutionary tracks, isochrones, and ZAHB loci calculated with the Princeton-Goddard-PUC (PGPUC) stellar evolutionary code, which has been updated with the most recent input physics and compared with other theoretical databases. The chemical composition grid covers 9 Z ranging from Z=1.60x10^-4 to 1.57x10^-2, 7 Y from Y=0.230 to 0.370, and an alpha-element enhancement of [alpha/Fe]=0.3. The effects of different helium abundances that can be observed in isochrones are: splits in the MS, differences in the L and Teff of the turn off point, splits in the SGB being more prominent for lower ages or higher metallicities, splits in the lower red giant branch being more prominent for higher ages or higher metallicities, differences in L of the RGB bump (with small changes in Teff), and differences in L at the RGB tip. At the ZAHB, when Y is increased there is an increase of L for low Teff, which is affected in different degrees depending on the age of the GC being studied. Finally, the ZAHB morphology distribution depending on the age explains how for higher GC metallicities a population with higher helium abundance could be hidden at the red ZAHB locus.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.