Paper detail

Effects of electrostatic correlations on electrokinetic phenomena

Classical theory of the electric double layer is based on the fundamental assumption of a dilute solution of point ions. There are a number of situations such as high applied voltages, high concentration of electrolytes, systems with multivalent ions, or solvent-free ionic liquids where the classical theory is often applied but the fundamental assumptions cannot be justified. Perhaps the most basic assumption underlying continuum models in electrokinetics is the mean-field approximation, that the electric field acting on each discrete ion is self-consistently determined by the local mean charge density. This paper considers situations where the mean-field approximation breaks down and electrostatic correlations become important. A fourth-order modified Poisson equation is developed that accounts for electrostatic correlations and captures the essential features in a simple continuum framework. The theory is derived variationally as a gradient approximation for non-local electrostatics, in which the dielectric permittivity becomes a differential operator. The only new parameter is a characteristic length scale for correlated ion pairs. The model is able to capture subtle aspects of more detailed simulations based on Monte Carlo, molecular dynamics, or density functional theory and allows for the straightforward calculation of electrokinetic flows in correlated liquids, for the first time. Departures from classical Helmholtz-Smoluchowski theory are controlled by the dimensionless ratio of the correlation length to the Debye screening length. Charge-density oscillations tend to reduce electro-osmotic flow and streaming current, and over-screening of the surface charge can lead to flow reversal. These effects also help to explain the apparent charge-induced thickening of double layers in induced-charge electrokinetic phenomena.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.