Paper detail

Effects of dust on light-curves of εAur type stars

εAuriga is one of the most mysterious objects on the sky. Prior modeling of its light-curve assumed a dark, inclined, non-transparent or semi-transparent, dusty disk with a central hole. The hole was necessary to explain the light-curve with a sharp mid-eclipse brightening. The aim of the present paper is to study the effects of dust on the light-curves of eclipsing binary stars and to develop an alternative physical model for $ε$ Aur type objects which is based on the optical properties of dust grains. The code Shellspec has been modified to calculate the light-curves and spectra of such objects. The code solves the radiative transfer along the line of sight in interacting binaries. Dust and angle dependent Mie scattering were introduced into the code for this purpose. Our model of $ε$ Aur consists of two geometrically thick flared disks: an internal optically thick disk and an external optically thin disk which absorbs and scatters radiation. Disks are in the orbital plane and are almost edge-on. We argue that there is no need for an inclined disk with a hole to explain the current eclipse of $ε$ Aur not even if there is a possible shallow mid-eclipse brightening. It was demonstrated that phase dependent light scattering and the optical properties of the dust can have an important effect on the light-curves of such stars and can even produce a mid-eclipse brightening. This is a natural consequence of the strong forward scattering. It was also demonstrated that shallow mid-eclipse brightening might result from eclipses by nearly edge-on flared (dusty or gaseous) disks.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.