Paper detail

Effects of disorder on polaritonic and dark states in a cavity using the disordered Tavis-Cummings model

We consider molecules confined to a microcavity whose dimensions are such that an excitation of the molecule is nearly resonant with a cavity mode. We investigate the situation where the excitation energies of the molecules are randomly distributed with a mean value of $ε_a$ and variance $σ$. For this case, we find a solution that approaches the exact result for large values of the number density $\mathscr{N}$ of the molecules. We find the conditions for the existence of the polaritonic states, as well as expressions for their energies. The polaritonic states are quite stable against disorder. Analytical results are verified by comparison with simulations. When $ε_a$ is equal to that of the cavity state $ε_c$ (on resonance) the gap between the two polaritonic states is found to increase with disorder, the increase being equal to $2 \frac{σ^2}{\sqrt{\mathscr{N}}|\tilde{V}|}$ where $\tilde{V}$ is the coupling of a molecular excitation to the cavity state. An analytic expression is found for the disorder induced width of the polaritonic peak. We results for various densities of states, and the absorption spectrum. The dark states that exist in the case $σ=0$ turn "grey" in presence of disorder with their contribution to the absorption increasing with $σ$. We analyze the effect of including lifetimes of the cavity and molecular states and find that in the strong coupling regime, the width of the polaritonic peaks is dominated by the lifetime effect and that disorder plays almost no role, if the Rabi splitting is sufficiently large. We also consider the case where there is (a) orientational disorder as well as (b) spatial variation of the cavity field and find that they effectively amount to a renormlisation of the coupling.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.