Paper detail

Effects of Defect on Work Function and Energy Alignment of PbI2: Implications for Solar Cell Applications

Two-dimensional (2D) layered lead iodide (PbI2) is an important precursor and common residual species during the synthesis of lead-halide perovskites. There currently exist some debates and uncertainties about the effect of excess PbI2 on the efficiency and stability of the solar cell with respect to its energy alignment and energetics of defects. Herein, by applying the first-principles calculations, we investigate the energetics, changes of work function and the defective levels associated with the iodine vacancy (VI) and interstitial iodine (II) defects of monolayer PbI2 (ML-PbI2). We find that the PbI2 has a very low formation energy of VI of 0.77 and 0.19 eV for dilute and high concentration, respectively, reflecting coalescence tendency of isolated VI, much lower than that of vacancies in other 2D materials like phosphorene. Similar to VI, a low formation energy of II of 0.65 eV is found, implying a high population of such defects. Both defects generate in-gap defective levels which are mainly due to the unsaturated chemical bonds of p-orbitals of exposed Pb or inserted I. Such rich defective levels allow the VI and II as the reservoir or sinks of electron/hole carriers in PbI2. Our results suggest that the remnant PbI2 in perovskite MAPbI3 (or FAPbI3) would play dual opposite roles in affecting the efficiency of the perovskite: (1) Forming Schottky-type interface with MAPbI3 (or FAPbI3) in which the built-in potential would facilitate the electron-hole separation and prolong the carrier lifetime; (2) Acting as the recombination centers due to the deep defective levels. To promote the efficiency by the Schottky effect, our work reveals that the II defect is favored, and to reduce the recombination centers the VI defect should be suppressed. Our results shall be beneficial in improving strategies for the related optoelectronics applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.