Paper detail

Effects of baryon removal on the structure of dwarf spheroidal galaxies

Dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs) are extremely gas-poor, dark matter-dominated galaxies, which make them ideal to test the predictions of the cold dark matter (CDM) model. We argue that the removal of the baryonic component from gas-rich dwarf irregular galaxies, the progenitors of dSphs, can substantially reduce their central density. Thus, it may play an important role in alleviating one of the problems of the CDM model related to the structure of relatively massive satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW). Traditionally, collisionless cosmological N-body simulations are used when confronting theoretical predictions with observations. However, these simulations assume that the baryon fraction everywhere in the Universe is equal to the cosmic mean, which can be incorrect for dSphs. We find that the combination of (i) the lower baryon fraction in dSphs compared to the cosmic mean and (ii) the concentration of baryons in the inner part of the MW halo can go a long way towards explaining the observed circular velocity profiles of dSphs. We find that the blowing away of baryons by ram pressure, when the dwarfs fall into larger galaxies, decreases the circular velocity profile of the satellite and reduces the density in the central ~200-500 pc by a factor of (1 - f_b)^4 ~ 0.5, where f_b is the cosmological fraction of baryons. Additionally, the enhanced baryonic mass in the central regions of the parent galaxy generates tidal forces, which are larger than those experienced by subhaloes in traditional N-body simulations. Increased tidal forces substantially alter circular velocity profiles for satellites with pericentres less than 50 kpc. We show that these two effects are strong enough to bring the predictions of subhaloes from CDM simulations into agreement with the observed structure of MW dSphs, regardless of the details of the baryonic processes.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.