Paper detail

Effectiveness of Structural Restrictions for Hybrid CSPs

Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is a fundamental algorithmic problem that appears in many areas of Computer Science. It can be equivalently stated as computing a homomorphism $\mbox{$\bR \rightarrow \bGamma$}$ between two relational structures, e.g.\ between two directed graphs. Analyzing its complexity has been a prominent research direction, especially for {\em fixed template CSPs} in which the right side $\bGamma$ is fixed and the left side $\bR$ is unconstrained. Far fewer results are known for the {\em hybrid} setting that restricts both sides simultaneously. It assumes that $\bR$ belongs to a certain class of relational structures (called a {\em structural restriction} in this paper). We study which structural restrictions are {\em effective}, i.e.\ there exists a fixed template $\bGamma$ (from a certain class of languages) for which the problem is tractable when $\bR$ is restricted, and NP-hard otherwise. We provide a characterization for structural restrictions that are {\em closed under inverse homomorphisms}. The criterion is based on the {\em chromatic number} of a relational structure defined in this paper; it generalizes the standard chromatic number of a graph. As our main tool, we use the algebraic machinery developed for fixed template CSPs. To apply it to our case, we introduce a new construction called a "lifted language." We also give a characterization for structural restrictions corresponding to minor-closed families of graphs, extend results to certain Valued CSPs (namely conservative valued languages), and state implications for CSPs with ordered variables, (valued) CSPs on structures with large girth, and for the maximum weight independent set problem on some restricted families of graphs including graphs with large girth.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.