Paper detail

Effective Field Theory for Long Strings

In previous work we used magnetic SU(N) gauge theory with adjoint representation Higgs scalars to describe the long distance quark-antiquark interaction in pure Yang-Mills theory, and later to obtain an effective string theory. The empirically determined parameters of the non-Abelian effective theory yielded $Z_N$ flux tubes resembling those of the Abelian Higgs model with Landau-Ginzburg parameter equal to $ 1/\sqrt{2}$, corresponding to a superconductor on the border between type I and type II. However, the physical significance of the differences between the Abelian and the $Z_N$ vortices was not elucidated and no principle was found to fix the value of the 'Landau-Ginzburg parameter' $κ$ of the non-Abelian theory determining the structure of the $Z_N$ vortices. Here we reexamine this point of view. We propose a consistency condition on $Z_N$ vortices underlying a confining string. This fixes the value of $κ$. The transverse distribution of pressure $p(r)$ in the resulting $Z_N$ flux tubes provides a physical picture of these vortices which differs essentially from that of the vortices of the Abelian Higgs model. We speculate that this general picture is valid independent of the details of the effective magnetic gauge theory from which it was obtained. Long wavelength fluctuations of the axis of the $Z_N$ vortices lead from an effective field theory to an effective string theory with the Nambu-Goto action. This effective string theory depends on a single parameter, the string tension $σ$. In contrast, the effective field theory has a second parameter, the intrinsic width 1/M of the flux tube.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.