Paper detail

Effect of transition metal doping on magnetic hardness of CeFe$_{12}$-based compounds

In this work, compositions of CeFe11X and CeFe10X2 with all 3d, 4d, and 5d transition metal substitutions are considered. Since many previous studies have focused on the CeFe11Ti compound, this particular compound became the starting point of our considerations and we gave it special attention. We first determined the optimal symmetry of the simplest CeFe11Ti structure model. We then observed that the calculated magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) correlates with the magnetic moment, which in turn strongly depends on the choice of the exchange-correlation potential. MAE, magnetic moments, and magnetic hardness were determined for all compositions considered. Moreover, the calculated dependence of the MAE on the spin magnetic moment allowed us to predict the upper limits of the MAE. We also showed that it does not depend on the choice of the exchange-correlation potential form. The economically justifiable compositions with the highest magnetic hardness values are CeFe11W, CeFe10W2, CeFe11Mn, CeFe10Mn2, CeFe11Mo, CeFe10Mo2, and CeFe10Nb2. However, calculations suggest that, like CeFe12, these compounds are not chemically stable and could require additional treatments to stabilize the composition. Further alloying of the selected compositions with elements embedded in interstitial positions confirms the positive effect of such dopants on hard magnetic properties. Subsequent calculations performed for comparison for selected isostructural La-based compounds lead to similar MAE results as for Ce-based compounds, suggesting a secondary effect of 4f electrons. Calculations were performed using the full-potential local-orbital electronic structure code FPLO18, whose unique fully relativistic implementation of the fixed spin moment method allowed us to calculate the MAE dependence of the magnetic moment.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.