Paper detail

Effect of the toroidal magnetic field on the runaway instability of relativistic tori

Runaway instability operates in fluid tori around black holes. It affects systems close to the critical (cusp overflowing) configuration. The runaway effect depends on the radial profile l(R) of the angular momentum distribution of the fluid, on the dimension-less spin a of the central black hole, and other factors, such as self-gravity. Previously it was demonstrated that, for the power-law dependence of the radial angular momentum profile, non-magnetized tori always become runaway stable for a sufficiently high positive value of q. Here we discuss the role of runaway instability within a framework of an axially symmetric model of perfect fluid endowed with a purely toroidal magnetic field. The gradual accretion of material over the cusp transfers the mass and angular momentum into the black hole, thereby changing the intrinsic parameters of the Kerr metric. We studied the effect of the ratio of gas to magnetic pressure and other parameters of the model on the evolution of critical configurations that are just on the verge of cusp overflow. We show that the toroidal magnetic component inside an accretion torus does not change the frequency of its oscillations significantly. We identify these oscillations as the radial epicyclic mode. These weak effects can trigger the runaway instability even in situations when the purely hydrodynamical regime of the torus is stable. On the other hand, in most cases the stable configuration remains unaffected, and the initial deviations gradually decay after several orbital periods. We show examples of the torus evolution depending on the initial magnetization beta, the slope q, and the spin a. The toroidal magnetic field plays a more important role in the early phases of the accretion process until the perturbed configuration finds a new equilibrium or disappears because of the runaway instability.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.