Paper detail

Effect of the choice of stagnation density in data-fitted first- and second-order traffic models

For a class of data-fitted macroscopic traffic models, the influence of the choice of the stagnation density on the model accuracy is investigated. This work builds on an established framework of data-fitted first-order Lighthill-Whitham-Richards (LWR) models and their second-order Aw-Rascle-Zhang (ARZ) generalizations. These models are systematically fitted to historic fundamental diagram data, and then their predictive accuracy is quantified via a version of the three-detector problem test, considering vehicle trajectory data and single-loop sensor data. The key outcome of this study is that with commonly suggested stagnation densities of 120 vehicles/km/lane and above, information travels backwards too slowly. It is then demonstrated that the reduction of the stagnation density to 90-100 vehicles/km/lane addresses this problem and results in a significant improvement of the predictive accuracy of the considered models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.