Paper detail

Effect of soft and hard x-rays on shock propagation, preheating and ablation characteristics in pure and doped Be ablators

In this paper, we analyze the performance of pure and doped Be ablators used for Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) pellets in terms of shock velocity, shock breakout temperature, preheat temperature and mass ablation rate through radiation hydrodynamic (RHD) simulations. For this study, we apply a constant radiation profile (drive temperatures varying from 120 - 200 eV) consisting of a low frequency Planck spectrum (soft x-rays) and a high frequency Gaussian spectrum (hard x-rays, commonly termed as "M-band") on a planar foil of the ablator. The fraction of energy density in the hard x-ray spectrum ($α$) has been varied from 0 to 0.25. The predominant effect of hard x-rays is to preheat the ablator ahead of the shock front. Steady rise in preheat temperature and shock breakout temperature is observed on increasing the fraction of hard x-rays. Preheating can be mitigated by doping Be with a mid-Z element Cu as its opacity is much higher in the high frequency region. On doping Be with 1\% Cu, the shock velocities decrease slightly compared to pure Be. However, higher shock velocities are observed on increasing the fraction of M-band. We observe significant decrease in shock breakout and maximum preheat temperature in doped Be foil. Steady rise in these temperatures is observed on increasing $α$. We have proposed new scaling relations for shock velocity, shock breakout temperature, maximum preheat temperature and mass ablation rate with the radiation temperature and the fraction of M-band energy density in both pure and doped Be ablators. In terms of ablator performance, Cu doped Be ablator is found to be superior to pure Be. Though doping significantly reduces preheating, the mass ablation rates are nearly unaffected.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.