Paper detail

Effect of slip transmission at grain boundaries in Al bicrystals

The effect of slip transfer on the deformation mechanisms of Al bicrystals was explored using a rate-dependent dislocation-based crystal plasticity model. Three different types of grain boundaries (GBs) were included in the model by modifying the rate of dislocation accumulation near the GB in the Kocks-Mecking law, leading to fully-opaque (dislocation blocking), fully-transparent and partially-transparent GBs. In the latter, slip transmission is only allowed in pairs of SS in neighbour grains that are suitably oriented for slip transfer according to the Luster-Morris parameter. Modifications of the GB character led to important changes in the deformation mechanisms at the GB. In general, bicrystals with fully-opaque boundaries showed an increase in the dislocation density near the GB, which was associated with an increase in the Von Mises stress. In contrast, the dislocation pile-ups and the stress concentration were less pronounced in the case of partially-transparent boundaries as the slip in one grain can progress into the next grain with some degree of continuity. No stress concentrations were found at these boundaries for fully-transparent boundaries, and there was continuity of strain across the boundary, which is not typical of most experimentally observed GBs. Simulations of ideal bicrystals oriented for favorable slip transfer on the most highly favored slip system in grains with high Schmid factors for slip transfer depends on the number of active SS in operation in the neighborhood and that most boundaries will lead to nearly opaque conditions while some boundaries will be transparent. Finally, the model was applied to a particular experimentally observed GB in which slip transfer was clearly operating indicating that the model predicted a nearly transparent GB.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.