Paper detail

Effect of signature change in NGR

The field equations of the new general relativity (NGR) have been applied to an absolute parallelism space having three unknown functions of the radial coordinate. The field equations have been solved using two different schemes. In the first scheme, we used the conventional procedure used in orthodox general relativity. In the second scheme, we examined the effect of signature change. The latter scheme gives a solution which is different from the Schwarzschild one. In both methods we find solution of the field equations under the same constraint imposed on the parameters of the theory. We also calculated the energy associated with the solutions in the two cases using the superpotential method. We found that the energetic content of one of the solutions is different from that of the other. A comparison between the two solutions obtained in the present work and a third one obtained by Hayashi and Shirafuji (1979) shows that the change of the signature may give rise to new physics.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.