Paper detail

Effect of radiative transfer on damped Lyman-alpha and Lyman limit systems in cosmological SPH simulations

We study the effect of local stellar radiation and UVB on the physical properties of DLAs and LLSs at z=3 using cosmological SPH simulations. We post-process our simulations with the ART code for radiative transfer of local stellar radiation and UVB. We find that the DLA and LLS cross sections are significantly reduced by the UVB, whereas the local stellar radiation does not affect them very much except in the low-mass halos. This is because clumpy high-density clouds near young star clusters effectively absorb most of the ionizing photons from young stars. We also find that the UVB model with a simple density threshold for self-shielding effect can reproduce the observed column density distribution function of DLAs and LLSs very well, and we validate this model by direct radiative transfer calculations of stellar radiation and UVB with high angular resolution. We show that, with a self-shielding treatment, the DLAs have an extended distribution around star-forming regions typically on ~ 10-30 kpc scales, and LLSs are surrounding DLAs on ~ 30-60 kpc scales. Our simulations suggest that the median properties of DLA host haloes are: Mh = 2.4*10^10 Msun, SFR = 0.3 Msun/yr, M* = 2.4*10^8 Msun, and Z/Zsun = 0.1. About 30 per cent of DLAs are hosted by haloes having SFR = 1 - 20 Msun/yr, which is the typical SFR range for LBGs. More than half of DLAs are hosted by the LBGs that are fainter than the current observational limit. Our results suggest that fractional contribution to LLSs from lower mass haloes is greater than for DLAs. Therefore the median values of LLS host haloes are somewhat lower with Mh = 9.6*10^9 Msun, SFR = 0.06 Msun/yr, M* = 6.5*10^7 Msun and Z/Zsun = 0.08. About 80 per cent of total LLS cross section are hosted by haloes with SFR < 1 Msun/yr, hence most LLSs are associated with low-mass halos with faint LBGs below the current detection limit.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.